## AFT Blog

Welcome to the Applied Flow Technology Blog where you will find the latest news and training on how to use AFT Fathom, AFT Arrow, AFT Impulse, AFT xStream and other AFT software products.
Font size: +
2 minutes reading time (300 words)

# Problems With Heat Exchanger Specified Heat Rate In Constants?

Using “Specified Heat Rate In Constants” for the thermal model of heat exchangers can often cause problems in system models.  The reason why is because this thermal model type causes the heat exchanger to act like an “assigned heat input” junction as does an assigned flow junction does for providing constant flow rates.  Another problem is that this thermal model can cause unrealistic temperature changes across a heat exchanger.  When the heat rate is specified and the mass flow rate and heat capacity are calculated based on the system solution, the temperature change will be whatever is required to maintain the specified heat rate.  This is analogous to the way an assigned flow junction will add whatever pressure is necessary to maintain a specified flow.

It is always best to use other heat exchanger thermal models and the heat rate for the heat exchanger will be available as an output that can be compared against the original desired heat rate.

If the heat rate is known as well as a function of flow rate, then the thermal model “specified heat rate in vs. flow” can be used.  One would enter this information into a table just like establishing a resistance curve as a pressure loss model.  Use the zero point as the first data point (zero flow rate and zero heat input).  Then enter the heat rate and mass flow rate that is known, and finally add one more data point where the flow rate is doubled and the heat rate is quadrupled.  This will allow the heat exchanger to modulate its heat rate with the system flow rate and can produce more accurate results.  The screenshot below contains the data needed for the curve fit as well as the generated curve in the heat exchanger specifications window itself.

[...] use for each heat exchanger (see the following link for a discussion on this type of thermal model https://www.aft.com/support/product-tips/entry/2012/02/21/problems-with-heat-exchanger-specified-heat-rate-in-constants).  A design factor could be used for reducing the junction heat transfer for each heat exchanger [...]

[...] use for each heat exchanger (see the following link for a discussion on this type of thermal model https://www.aft.com/support/product-tips/entry/2012/02/21/problems-with-heat-exchanger-specified-heat-rate-in-constants).  A design factor could be used for reducing the junction heat transfer for each heat exchanger [...]
on Wednesday, 10 April 2013 03:37

Very useful tip. Thank you.

In many heat-exchangers, the relationship between heat-transfer & flow-rate would have a curve with concave downward shape. This tends to be different to pressure loss vs flow-rate curves, which typically have concave upward shapes.

Very useful tip. Thank you. In many heat-exchangers, the relationship between heat-transfer & flow-rate would have a curve with concave downward shape. This tends to be different to pressure loss vs flow-rate curves, which typically have concave upward shapes.
Wednesday, 18 September 2024

Remember Me

### Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Name *